Search for: All records

Deadlocks are one of the most notorious concurrency bugs, and significant research has focused on detecting them efficiently. Dynamic predictive analyses work by observing concurrent executions, and reason about alternative interleavings that can witness concurrency bugs. Such techniques offer scalability and sound bug reports, and have emerged as an effective approach for concurrency bug detection, such as data races. Effective dynamic deadlock prediction, however, has proven a challenging task, as no deadlock predictor currently meets the requirements of soundness, high-precision, and efficiency.

In this paper, we first formally establish that this tradeoff is unavoidable, by showing that (a) sound and complete deadlock prediction is intractable, in general, and (b) even the seemingly simpler task of determining the presence of potential deadlocks, which often serve as unsound witnesses for actual predictable deadlocks, is intractable. The main contribution of this work is a new class of predictable deadlocks, called sync(hronization)-preserving deadlocks. Informally, these are deadlocks that can be predicted by reordering the observed execution while preserving the relative order of conflicting critical sections. We present two algorithms for sound deadlock prediction based on this notion. Our first algorithm SPDOffline detects all sync-preserving deadlocks, with running time that is linear per abstract deadlock pattern, a novel notion also introduced in this work. Our second algorithm SPDOnline predicts all sync-preserving deadlocks that involve two threads in a strictly online fashion, runs in overall linear time, and is better suited for a runtime monitoring setting.

We implemented both our algorithms and evaluated their ability to perform offline and online deadlock-prediction on a large dataset of standard benchmarks. Our results indicate that our new notion of sync-preserving deadlocks is highly effective, as (i) it can characterize the vast majority of deadlocks and (ii) it can be detected using an online, sound, complete and highly efficient algorithm.

 

Happens before-based dynamic analysis is the go-to technique for detecting data races in large scale software projects due to the absence of false positive reports. However, such analyses are expensive since they employ expensive vector clock updates at each event, rendering them usable only for in-house testing. In this paper, we present a sampling-based, randomized race detector that processes onlyconstantly manyevents of the input trace even in the worst case. This is the firstsub-lineartime (i.e., running ino(n) time wherenis the length of the trace) dynamic race detection algorithm; previous sampling based approaches like run in linear time (i.e.,O(n)). Our algorithm is a property tester for -race detection — it is sound in that it never reports any false positive, and on traces that are far, with respect to hamming distance, from any race-free trace, the algorithm detects an -race with high probability. Our experimental evaluation of the algorithm and its comparison with state-of-the-art deterministic and sampling based race detectors shows that the algorithm does indeed have significantly low running time, and detects races quite often.

 

Concurrent programs are notoriously hard to write correctly, as scheduling nondeterminism introduces subtle errors that are both hard to detect and to reproduce. The most common concurrency errors are (data) races, which occur when memory-conflicting actions are executed concurrently. Consequently, considerable effort has been made towards developing efficient techniques for race detection. The most common approach is dynamic race prediction: given an observed, race-free trace σ of a concurrent program, the task is to decide whether events of σ can be correctly reordered to a trace σ * that witnesses a race hidden in σ. In this work we introduce the notion of sync(hronization)-preserving races. A sync-preserving race occurs in σ when there is a witness σ * in which synchronization operations (e.g., acquisition and release of locks) appear in the same order as in σ. This is a broad definition that strictly subsumes the famous notion of happens-before races. Our main results are as follows. First, we develop a sound and complete algorithm for predicting sync-preserving races. For moderate values of parameters like the number of threads, the algorithm runs in Õ( N ) time and space, where N is the length of the trace σ. Second, we show that the problem has a Ω( N /log 2 N ) space lower bound, and thus our algorithm is essentially time and space optimal. Third, we show that predicting races with even just a single reversal of two sync operations is NP-complete and even W1-hard when parameterized by the number of threads. Thus, sync-preservation characterizes exactly the tractability boundary of race prediction, and our algorithm is nearly optimal for the tractable side. Our experiments show that our algorithm is fast in practice, while sync-preservation characterizes races often missed by state-of-the-art methods. 

Model checking systems formalized using probabilistic models such as discrete time Markov chains (DTMCs) and Markov decision processes (MDPs) can be reduced to computing constrained reachability properties. Linear programming methods to compute reachability probabilities for DTMCs and MDPs do not scale to large models. Thus, model checking tools often employ iterative methods to approximate reachability probabilities. These approximations can be far from the actual probabilities, leading to inaccurate model checking results. On the other hand, specialized techniques employed in existing state-of-the-art exact quantitative model checkers, don’t scale as well as their iterative counterparts. In this work, we present a new model checking algorithm that improves the approximate results obtained by scalable iterative techniques to compute exact reachability probabilities. Our techniques are implemented as an extension of the PRISM model checker and are evaluated against other exact quantitative model checking engines. 

Writing concurrent programs is notoriously hard due to scheduling non-determinism. The most common concurrency bugs are data races, which are accesses to a shared resource that can be executed concurrently. Dynamic data-race prediction is the most standard technique for detecting data races: given an observed, data-race-free trace t, the task is to determine whether t can be reordered to a trace t* that exposes a data-race. Although the problem has received significant practical attention for over three decades, its complexity has remained elusive. In this work, we address this lacuna, identifying sources of intractability and conditions under which the problem is efficiently solvable. Given a trace t of size n over k threads, our main results are as follows. First, we establish a general O(k · n2·(k-1) upper-bound, as well as an O(nk) upper-bound when certain parameters of t are constant. In addition, we show that the problem is NP-hard and even W[1]-hard parameterized by k, and thus unlikely to be fixed-parameter tractable. Second, we study the problem over acyclic communication topologies, such as server-clients hierarchies. We establish an O(k2 · d · n2 · log n) upper-bound, where d is the number of shared variables accessed in t. In addition, we show that even for traces with k = 2 threads, the problem has no O(n2-ϵ) algorithm under the Orthogonal Vectors conjecture. Since any trace with 2 threads defines an acyclic topology, our upper-bound for this case is optimal up to polynomial improvements for up to moderate values of k and d. Finally, motivated by existing heuristics, we study a distance-bounded version of the problem, where the task is to expose a data race by a witness trace that is similar to t. We develop an algorithm that works in O(n) time when certain parameters of t are constant.